Peer Review Process

Editorial Policy

Peer Review Process

Faletehan Health Journal (FHJ) applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure scientific quality, originality, ethical compliance, and editorial integrity.

At a Glance

Review model Double-blind peer review
Initial screening Editorial check before review
Similarity check Plagiarism screening required
Reviewers At least two independent reviewers

Review Workflow

The editorial process follows these stages before a final decision is made.

1

Submission Screening

The editorial team evaluates whether the manuscript fits the journal scope, follows the author guidelines, and shows basic methodological quality.

2

Similarity and Ethics Check

Manuscripts are checked using plagiarism detection software. Papers with serious ethical concerns, excessive similarity, or major deficiencies may be rejected at this stage.

3

External Review

Eligible manuscripts are sent to at least two reviewers with relevant expertise for independent double-blind assessment.

4

Editorial Evaluation

The editor considers the reviewer reports, scientific merit, clarity, originality, ethical compliance, and overall contribution of the manuscript.

5

Final Decision

The editor issues the final decision. If reviewer recommendations differ substantially, an additional reviewer may be invited.

Possible Editorial Decisions

After the peer review process, one of the following decisions may be issued.

Accept

The manuscript is accepted for publication with no further substantive revision required.

Minor Revision

The manuscript is publishable after limited revision based on reviewer and editor comments.

Major Revision

The manuscript has potential but requires substantial revision before further editorial consideration.

Reject

The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form or does not meet journal standards.

Important Notes for Authors

  • FHJ applies a double-blind review model.
  • Author identity should not appear in the manuscript file.
  • Initial editorial screening is required before peer review.
  • The first review round is conducted as timely as possible, depending on reviewer availability.
  • The final editorial decision rests with the editor.

Need Further Information?

If you need clarification about the review workflow, please contact the editorial office.

Email: fhjonlinejournal@gmail.com

WhatsApp: +62 812-1228-9442